Text
1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the plaintiff's claim extended at the trial room, shall be modified as follows:
The defendant.
Reasons
1. The reasoning for this Court’s explanation is as follows: (a) it is identical to the entry of “1. Basic Facts” in the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following parts written or added; and (b) it is citing it as it is by the text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
The third fifth fifth of the judgment of the court of first instance is the executor, and the defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant is the contractor of the apartment construction of this case, and the defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's two industries is the contractor of the apartment construction
"In the first instance and the first instance court" shall be added in front of "the apartment of this case" which will be the third second lower of the judgment of the first instance.
Attached Form 1. "Entry of "the details of each item or annual defect" in attached Form 1. "The details of each item or annual defect" in attached Form 1. "The details of each item or annual defect of the first instance court" and attached Form 3.
2. Each entry into “the details of defects by the assessment item and by the year” shall be written.
The phrase "(s)" below the fourth second sentence of the first instance court shall be written in the following manner:
[mark] Notwithstanding 172,83, 172,10,65, 65, 175, 175, 284, 207, 207, 208, 207, 304, 478, 207, 208, 474, 207, 207, 478, 474, 207, 208, 306, 474, 207, 208, 306, 474, 207, 306, 47, 974, 206, 207, 306, 208, 47, 1974, 306, 207, 306, 207, 745, 000, 000,745, 7405, 7407, 197, 1974, 1637
On the other hand, the appraiser C of this case is an excessive construction cost for defect repair works due to the erroneous application of the employment insurance rate.