A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Highest 1031"

1. On August 2015, the Defendant: (a) performed drinking in a restaurant operated by the victim D in North Korea-gu, North Korea-si, at around 10:00, on August 15, 2015; and (b) performed drinking in a vinyl of 10 C; (c) however, (d) the Defendant was in need of going out from the victim.

The phrase “this year” refers to the phrase “this year,” and, as a result, the so-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called “A-called 1st century, the

2. Obstruction of business;

A. On July 1, 2015, around 00:27, the Defendant: (a) expressed the intent to enter the coffee shop for the F operation of the victim F in North-gu E at the port of call to customers without any justifiable reason; (b) obstructed the victim’s coffee business by force over about 20 minutes, such as taking out the coffee shop and driving away other customers.

B. On September 28, 2015, around 23:00, the Defendant expressed the victim’s D operation restaurant in North Korea-gu, North Korea-si, with the larger interest of “gent, flusium,” and obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force over about 20 minutes, by blocking the front of the restaurant entrance and preventing other customers from entering the restaurant.

(c)

On October 4, 2015, the Defendant requested the victim to alcohol at the main point of the operation of the Victim H located in North-gu G at the port of 20:0 on October 4, 2015, but, on the ground that the victim was refused to do so, the Defendant is equal to the bit of bitch bitch

The victim’s main business was interfered with by force over about 30 minutes, such as taking the victim’s desire for a large amount of care, and failing to comply with the victim’s demand for eviction, and continuously taking the victim’s desire to leave.

(d)

On October 21, 2015, the Defendant, at around 21:00 around 21:0, expressed the victim D’s desire to take a large amount of 20 minutes, including, but not limited to, “Gedgedging, flusing, fluoring, fluoring, killing, fluoring,” and preventing the entrance of other customers.