logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 안동지원 2019.09.18 2019고단169
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(운전자폭행등)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around April 21, 2019, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Drivers, Violence, etc.) committed assault to the victim without any reason while under the influence of alcohol while the Defendant she was drunkly driving the victim’s face by drinking while driving the cab in front of the e station located in D at permanent residence around 22:30 on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim who is a driver of a vehicle in operation.

2. The defrauded stated that the Defendant would take a taxi in front of the G Bank located in F at the time and place set forth in paragraph 1, and that the Defendant would take a taxi in front of the G Bank located in F at the time of permanent residence, at the time and place.

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay taxi charges to the victim even if he/she uses the taxi because he/she did not have any money at the time.

Nevertheless, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim, and caused the victim to operate the said taxi to the destination, and did not pay 48,000 won for the taxi fee, thereby acquiring pecuniary benefits equivalent to the said amount.

3. On April 4, 2019, the Defendant: (a) heard from G Bank prior to permanent residence G Bank in F on April 22 and 36, 2019, the Defendant used the phrase “I would be able to see the taxi expenses and return home,” which was called “I would be able to see the taxi expenses and return home,” which was sent to the site after receiving a report of 112 from H district unit of the permanent police station having been dispatched to the site, and assaulted I, a police officer, at one time on the floor of his/her hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to B and I;

1. Report on the occurrence of the case;

1. A report on internal investigation (attaching a taxi charge receipt);

1. A vehicle operated by a victim B of the investigation report;

arrow