logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.04.08 2014나2002943
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or deletion as follows. Thus, this is acceptable by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Part 5 of the judgment of the first instance court, "873,966 shares" in Part 18 and Part 19 shall be deemed "873,936 shares".

The Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office of Seoul, the 10th page 9 of the judgment of the first instance court, the 10th page 21, the 11th page 11, and the 19th page 19, the 10th page 9 "Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office", the 10th page 21, and the 11th page 19 "date of issuance",

Part 14 to 12 of the decision of the court of first instance shall be deleted. "A child shall be deemed to be effective in violation of the restriction on stock transfer."

Part 16 of the judgment of the first instance court is "KC Construction" in Part 5 of the judgment of the first instance court as "KC Construction."

No. 7 of the first instance court's decision No. 16, "B. Determination on the conjunctive claim for Defendant KB-invested Securities" is "C. Determination on the conjunctive claim for Defendant KB-Invested Securities".

2. The decision of the first instance court is legitimate, so the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow