beta
Text
1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.
2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. The reasoning for this part of the reasoning of the disposition by the court is as follows, and the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act are cited, except for the second part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows.
(Ma) A person who commits a joint crime (violation of Wastes Control Act) by Defendant A (the Plaintiff in this case; hereinafter the same shall apply), Defendant E, or Defendant F shall not dispose of wastes in any place other than those prepared by the manager of facilities, such as Special Self-Governing City, Special Self-Governing Province, Special Self-Governing Province, or the head of Si/Gun/Gu or
Nevertheless, in collusion with H, I, and J on January 8, 2017, the Defendants: (a) in E, D, andO (a total of 4,358 square meters) of E, Hacheon-si, Gyeonggi-do; (b) in the process of operating the K in charge of the management of commercial wastes, H, who was entrusted with the disposal of commercial wastes by G from the actual operator of the K in charge of the management of the operation site, requested the J to commit the act of dumping commercial wastes, such as waste synthetic resin, etc. discharged from the K in charge of the management of the operation site through the introduction of I; (c) in the name of L, the J leased the said land to have the waste collection and transportation business operators, such as Defendant A, etc., waste collection and transportation business operators, such industrial wastes, etc.; and (d) Defendant E, Defendant E, and F, in accordance with the direction, ordered Defendant E, Defendant F, to transport the industrial wastes in question at night, to collect waste from the said land without permission.
[C] On October 27, 2020, the Plaintiff joined Suwon District Court 2019Kadan394 case (the same court 2018 Godan6153 case)
In the following facts, the conviction was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 8 months for a period of 2 years, including the criminal facts in the combined case:
After that, the above judgment shall expire of the appeal period.