Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B, Defendant A, and Victim D (Age 41) are patients of F Hospital in Daegu-gu E.

1. On April 8, 2015, Defendant B: (a) around 15:30 on April 15, 2015, the victim 508 at the above F Hospital; (b) took the victim’s face twice on the ground that the victim took a bath, and (c) took the victim’s face, he/she inflicted injury on the victim, such as brain-dead, for which three weeks of treatment is required.

2. Defendant A, at the same time and at the same place, had the victim fighting with B and the victim fighting, and had the victim spawned his ebbage, and had the victim spawn the ebb, and had the victim spawn the eb, and had the victim spawn the victim’s ebb, and had the victim spawn the victim

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. The first police statement about D (including the injury diagnosis certificate attached thereto);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes that contain some statements among police interrogation protocols of H and D;

1. The Defendants: Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of punishment;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Defendants and defense counsel’s assertion on the assertion of Defendants and defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are asserted as follows: although Defendant B was at the time of the victim, Defendant B did not inflict any injury on the victim, and Defendant A only told the dispute between Defendant B and the victim.

However, the evidence presented in its holding and the following circumstances, i.e., internal investigation report (record No. 74) of G Preparation, stating, “it is difficult to recognize that the victim suffered injury because there is no special credit and no diagnosis exists to recognize injury at the time of the preparation of the suspect interrogation protocol on July 1, 2015,” and the victim’s photograph is attached. However, this is not the instant case that occurred on April 8, 2015, but the instant case that occurred on April 20, 2015.