logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2015.05.01 2014고단1881
상해
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 3,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 500,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 14, 2014, the Defendant: (a) 23:25, the Defendant was making telephone conversations on the 7-dong-ro 11-2-dong-ro Haak-ro, New-ro, New-ro, New-ro, 11-2, and 7-dong-ro-ro, a mutual vision was made on the ground that the victim B (year 41) demanded early harm; (b) the victim’s head and part less than the victim’s head and part less than the victim’s blurg with the brick of the brick and department glurg, and the victim’s face was taken at around 28 days in drinking; and (c) the victim’s face was hurged with an anti-path of the victim E (age 55) who was flading assault, so that he can tear the victim’s face.

2. Defendant B suffered an assault as above at the same date, time, and at the same place, and inflicted an injury on the victim A, such as franchising franchising, where the victim A’s face was spawned and pusheded, and where approximately three weeks of treatment was inflicted, he/she suffered an injury.

Summary of Evidence

[The point of paragraph (1) at the time of sale]

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Each legal statement of witness B and E in part;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Each photograph (the point referred to in paragraph (2) on the market);

1. Defendant B’s partial statement

1. Each legal statement of witness A and F;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) (Selection of Fine) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) (Selection of Fine): Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The Defendants and defense counsel asserted that their respective acts constitute self-defense or excessive defense. The perpetrator’s act is a victim’s intent to attack rather than defending the victim’s unfair attack. The perpetrator’s act is a victim’s first attack.

arrow