beta
Plaintiff, Appellant
Plaintiff (Attorney Lee Jae-tae, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)
Defendant, appellant and appellant
The Minister of Health and Welfare
Conclusion of Pleadings
September 7, 2005
The first instance judgment
Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2004Guhap13691, 14564 decided Dec. 28, 2004
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1. Purport of claim
The defendant's disposition of 162 days of business suspension of a medical care institution that was rendered on May 4, 2004 against the plaintiff and the disposition of 130 days of business suspension of a medical care institution that was made on May 20, 204 shall be revoked.
2. Purport of appeal
The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;
This Court’s reasoning is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Conclusion
Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.
Judges Lee Sung-sung (Presiding Judge) (Presiding Judge)