1. On January 14, 2015, the decision that the Defendant rendered against the Plaintiff on January 14, 2015 was revoked.

2...

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 21, 1978, the Plaintiff entered the Army, and was discharged from military service on March 31, 2013, as Warrantor.

B. On April 12, 201, during the period of military combat direction training (hereinafter “instant training”), the Plaintiff filed an application for registration with the Defendant to have rendered distinguished services to the State, asserting that he/she was faced with kneee on the concrete floor by going beyond the training at the Information Service Office of the Army B forces in the Army, and that he/she was suffering from the wounds of “Se fever and half-months, a slebroid, a slebroid,” thereby constituting “the instant wounds” (hereinafter “instant wounds”).

On February 25, 2014, the defendant made a decision corresponding to the requirements of soldiers and police officers wounded on duty and the requirements of military officers and police officers.

C. On June 26, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a second application for the registration of a person of distinguished service to the Defendant on the ground that on January 14, 2015, the Defendant rendered a decision on the Plaintiff on the following grounds: (a) on the ground that “the instant wound was injured in the performance of duties or education and training directly related to the national security, etc.; and (b) there is no proximate causal relation with the injury incurred in the performance of duties or education and training not directly related to the national security, etc.; and (c) the occurrence or aggravation of the aforementioned performance of duties is not recognized as having been caused or deteriorated due to the proximate causal relation with the national security, etc.” (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 4 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful (a judgment on the main claim)

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that, during the instant training period, the Plaintiff experienced a serious eromatic and stress disorder while extinguishing 2 hours daily 12 hours per week during the instant training period, and that the Plaintiff was at the Army Information Service Office of the Army, which is a training place around 19:00 on April 12, 201.