1. The plaintiff's main claim is dismissed.

2. The requirements of the Defendant’s military person, police officer, and police officer against the Plaintiff on January 18, 2016.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 23, 1994, the Plaintiff entered the National Defense Security Command, and was on December 30, 1994, and was on duty in the 868 Military Security Command, etc., after being on December 30, 1994, and was discharged from military service on October 31, 2015.

B. On May 21, 1997, the Plaintiff applied for the registration of a person of distinguished service to the Defendant on November 3, 2015, arguing that, “The two different types of nuclear escape certificates (hereinafter “the two different types”) were generated after conducting shock training, such as helicopter propellers, etc. (hereinafter “the instant training”) in order to perform complete operation among the presidential special security duties, among regular training for the 47 national counterterrorism training at the 47 national counterterrorism training site that belongs to the said 868 Security Team, which was exclusively in charge of the presidential security service, and for the promotion of the physical strength of the counterterrorism duties.”

C. On January 18, 2016, after the deliberation of the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement, the Defendant rendered a decision on the non-existence of the requirements for soldier or policeman wounded on the ground that “the performance of duties or education and training directly related to the security of national security, etc. of the wounded country, which is directly caused by the occurrence of the disease or the speed of the natural progress, or the performance of duties or education and training which are not directly related to the national security, etc., and are not rapidly aggravated at a speed above the outbreak or natural progress level,” and that the Plaintiff did not meet the requirements for soldier or policeman wounded on duty (hereinafter “instant Disposition 1”) and the requirements for soldier or policeman wounded on the ground that “the instant disposition

"each of the dispositions in this case" is referred to as "each of the dispositions in this case" in the first and second dispositions of this case.

(i) [The facts without dispute over the basis for recognition, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings.]

2. Whether each of the dispositions of this case is legitimate

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion did not have any scarcity disease before entering the Plaintiff, and thus, the instant difference is open to the public at a rapid speed during the instant training.

The land shall be crashed and on the ground.