Text
1. The decision that the Defendant rendered against the Plaintiff on June 9, 2017 constituted a non-conformity of the requirements for a person of distinguished service to the State shall be revoked.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On October 26, 2016, the Plaintiff entered the Air Force on December 11, 2006 and was discharged from active service on February 17, 2009, and on January 24, 2007, the Plaintiff applied for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State on the ground that he/she was suffering from an accident resulting from tree roots during his/her active service (hereinafter “instant accident”). On October 26, 2016, the Plaintiff applied for registration of a person of distinguished service to the Defendant as “blue blue on the left side” (hereinafter “the instant difference”).
B. On June 9, 2017, the Defendant: (a) hospitalized the Plaintiff’s elbow injuries from the tree roots in the medical records of the medical records of the medical records of his medical and private hospitals; and (b) hospitalized the Plaintiff into the left-hand elbow injuries; (c) it is difficult to view the “damage” as a specific type of disease to be deemed to have a functional disorder on the part of the main body due to extensive expression; (d) it is difficult to find the Plaintiff as a person eligible for veteran’s compensation in the medical records of his/her stage and private hospital; (b) it is difficult to view it as a difference in the official duty since the medical opinion of his/her specialist that it is possible to treat the Plaintiff as a temporary and short-term medical treatment, and that it is difficult to view it as a direct causal relation to the official duty of the State (it is difficult to prove that the medical records received by the Plaintiff after discharge had an objective causal relation with the military duty of the State, and thus, it cannot be deemed that the Plaintiff suffered direct harm or harm from the State’s duty.
[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 3, and