logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.08.09 2018고정869
응급의료에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 26, 2018, around 18:00, the Defendant was accompanied by the emergency hospital in D, which is located in D, in D, which is an emergency patient, to the guardian of C, who is an emergency patient.

No person shall interfere with the rescue, transfer, emergency treatment or medical treatment of an emergency patient by a person engaged in emergency medical services by means of violence, intimidation, deceptive scheme, threat or other means, or destroy, damage, or occupy medical facilities, equipment, medicines, or other objects for emergency medical services by a medical institution, etc.

Nevertheless, the defendant, on the ground that the defendant neglected the doctor F of the D Hospital's doctor F ( South, 36 years of age) of the D Hospital's doctor F (ma), was the victim, "I will dle and sit."

C. The franchis performed the franchising franchis, and obstructed the treatment of emergency patients for about 20 minutes, such as franchising franchis with pat and drinking franchis, and trying to look at the victim’s inside.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. AF statement;

1. Voluntary accompanying report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. Article 60 (1) 1 and 12 of the relevant Act on Criminal facts and the Emergency Medical Service Act on the Selection of Punishment, and Selection of Fines;

1. Detention in a workhouse (where a sentence of suspension of execution is invalidated or revoked, the time a fine is not paid) under Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) (one hundred thousand won per day) of the Criminal Act;

1. According to Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence of the Criminal Act, the Defendant’s act of obstructing the examination and treatment of emergency patients by assaulting those engaged in an emergency medical service and obstructing the examination and treatment of emergency patients is not so small that it makes it impossible or impossible to make another emergency patient’s life or physical structure worse.

However, it appears that the Defendant committed the instant crime without participating in a correct and correct answer to the fact that the Defendant was in an emergency situation and was in an emergency room, and the medical staff was not the same as properly treating the sentence (the Defendant’s punishment was eventually killed on the tenth day of January from the date of the instant case).

arrow