Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Damage to property and interference with business;

A. On March 16, 2017, around 16:44, the Defendant: (a) opposed to an election for the dismissal of the representative organized by the Committee for the Management of the Victim C Apartment Housing; (b) removed a written notice of dismissal voting, which is posted on the bulletin board, in his/her hand, and obstructed the management of the victim’s election by preventing the residents of the apartment from viewing a written public notice.

As a result, the Defendant destroyed the property owned by the victim and interfered with the management of the victim's election by force.

B. On March 18, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 06:50 on March 18, 2017 (around 21:37, as indicated in the facts charged, the Defendant’s correction is clear that it is a clerical error and does not affect the Defendant’s right of defense; (b) the Defendant opposed to the election for the dismissal of the representative supervised by the Committee for the Management of the Victims C Apartment Housing, and (c) removed a written notice of dismissal voting posted on the bulletin board on the bulletin board, thereby impairing its usefulness; and (d) prevented the residents of the above apartment from viewing the written notice, thereby hindering the victim’s election management affairs.

As a result, the Defendant destroyed the property owned by the victim and interfered with the management of the victim's election by force.

(c)

On March 20, 2017, around 21:37, the Defendant opposed to an election for the dismissal of the representative of the Dong in charge of the Victim C Apartment Housing Management Committee, and removed a written public notice of dismissal voting posted on the bulletin board of the seat, thereby impairing the effectiveness of the public notice, and preventing the residents of the above apartment from viewing a written public notice, thereby hindering the victim’s election management from being carried out smoothly.

As a result, the defendant damages the property owned by the victim and at the same time, manages the victim's election by force.