logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.10.19 2018고정354
공연음란
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 17, 2017, around 07:25, the Defendant committed an obscene act by openly making soup by inserting the finger hand inside the soup 'E' of the D 3rd floor located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, by inserting it into his soup bry brying part of the soup brying, and committing a fry and frying act.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A video CD taken by the injured party (a specific act that the Defendant takes out in a soup room, the background leading up to taking screen pictures, and F’s statement as to the situation before and after the commission of the crime, such as the Defendant’s act after knowing that screen pictures were taken, is consistent and concrete.

In the soup room on the day of the case, F, who first sees the Defendant, had the intention to put the Defendant at risk of criminal punishment until he is punished for perjury, and there is no reason to make the Defendant false statement in the statement.

볼 만한 사정이 전혀 없는데 다가, F의 법정에서의 자연스럽고 꾸밈없는 진술 태도, 당시 F이 촬영한 영상에 나타난 피고인의 행위 태양 등을 더해 보면, F의 진술을 충분히 신뢰할 만한 하다. 피고인은 수사기관에서 자고 있던 중 피해 자가 다리를 툭툭 치면서 ‘ 자위행위를 왜 하냐

“Along with the fact that she was fry, and that she was frightened in the front her part of the shoulder.”

According to the images taken at the time of the statement, F is required to be changed to her address.

T. We need to see the following facts: (a) the Defendant: (b) the Defendant: (c) was at the place in which he was able to deduct losses from the place; and (d) according to F’s statement, the Defendant made a statement that the Defendant had repeatedly committed self-defense by stopping over several minutes and re-absing, etc.; (b) the Defendant was able to influence the Defendant at the time.

shall not be deemed to exist.

Therefore, in full view of the circumstances before and after the F’s statement and other evidence submitted, the Defendant’s instant case.

arrow