Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the head of the headquarters B.

On September 6, 2017, around 19:06, the Defendant publicly posted the following comments on the posting (260 times) of the posting by outside managers of the case, which is posted by computers on the Internet D Association Freedom bulletin board at the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, and 1st century, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, 2017, thereby insulting the victim E.

I would like to do so, if you do so that you can do so, such as E, it is the same that you will do so.

In recent years, it is necessary to spread false facts that would be punished if you know that you would be false, enter a false domicile, and if you would like to engage in the same mother, but if you would like to do so, I would like to find a broad name by self-denunciation even in the name of the Roman.

The head of the Gu who helps "Mano" is aware of "Mano"

Along with this, it is easy to listen to all the peoples of the Republic of Korea, and it is difficult to do so, if it is the last day of the first day of the first day of the first day of the first day of the second day of the second day of the second day of the second day of the second day of the second day of the second day of the year.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on free bulletin board materials;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Summary of the assertion

A. The Defendant did not have the intent to insult the victim because the victim E knew that the victim E was a lusorous person who was a lusorous person by the F.

B. The Defendant posted the pertinent article to interfere with the duties of the Association as an executive officer of the D Association and to restrain a person who treats instructors belonging to the Association, which constitutes a justifiable act that does not go against social norms.

2. The intention of insult ① The victim sent a mail by pointing out his real name, and the victim’s name is written in the original text of the notice.

② At the time, the Defendant had a serious conflict with F, and the result was found in the victim’s address.