1. On July 22, 2013, the Defendant filed a claim for revocation of removal between the Plaintiff and the Intervenor joining the Defendant.

1. Details of the decision;

A. The Plaintiff is a school foundation established on February 4, 1966 and established and operated C secondary and high schools.

The Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor”) has served as a commercial information teacher at Chigh School from March 1, 2005.

On March 11, 2013, at around 08:10, the intervenor suspended the meeting without permission at the planning room held at the school room, and interfered with the meeting's affairs by pointing out highly strong complaints against the personnel assigned to the position of the principal, and interfering with the meeting's affairs. The principal refused to comply with the request, although the principal called "the fact that he did not inform him," and the assistant principal failed to comply with the request. The assistant principal who took a bath to the school teacher and took abusive language against the assistant principal who restrains him, followed the table table of the school room, followed the school room, puts on the assistant principal, and sold the face of the school room to the assistant principal, and destroyed the school room.

Grounds for Disciplinary Action

(3) On March 11, 2013, the Intervenor: (a) led teachers and staff in the school room who were in the school room due to the school room; (b) took the classical bath to the teachers and staff in the school room; and (c) destroyed the computer and the book of the assistant principal with a name tag attached to the assistant principal’s book; and (d) damaged the above documents on the book and left the workplace without permission (the grounds for disciplinary action).

(2) On March 12, 2013, the Intervenor spreaded false information to students that the Plaintiff, at around 09:30 on March 12, 2013, she was able to defend himself/herself due to the loss of glass by the chief director while she was able to defend himself/herself (the grounds for disciplinary action).

A) On March 14, 2013, the Intervenor spreads false information (such as chief director and relative ties, etc.) that is irrelevant to the class at the time of the career class (on March 14, 2013, to the students. At around 11:00 on the same day, the Intervenor abused the official authority of another teacher and infringed the right to teach students and the right to study of students by spreading false information by leaving the class without permission, and spreading false information into the class (the grounds for disciplinary action).