1. Each disciplinary measure taken by the Defendant against the Plaintiff A and C on January 4, 2019, against each reprimanded against the Plaintiff A and C for one month, Plaintiff B, and D.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiffs were public officials working in E Si Resource Circulation Division, and specifically, Plaintiff A, the head of division from August 4, 2014 to February 21, 2016; Plaintiff B, the head of the resource administration team from August 4, 2014 to September 21, 2015; Plaintiff C, the head of the resource management team from September 22, 2015 to March 6, 2018; and Plaintiff D, the head of the resource recycling team, while working as the resource recycling team from October 26, 2015 to September 26, 2017.

B. On June 20, 2018, Gyeonggi-do conducted an audit on the city E, and requested the relevant public officials, including the Plaintiffs, to take disciplinary action and take corrective measures against the relevant public officials. This request was made to Gyeonggi-do, but the request for re-deliberation was dismissed on September 21, 2018.

On October 19, 2018, E City requested a disciplinary resolution to the Gyeonggi-do Personnel Committee of Gyeonggi-do, and the said Committee decided to take disciplinary action against Plaintiffs A, B, and C on December 17, 2018, including “one month of reduction of salary,” and “regument” against Plaintiff D. Accordingly, on January 4, 2019, the Defendant took each disciplinary measure against the Plaintiffs on the grounds of violation of Article 48 (Duty of Good Faith) of the Local Public Officials Act, and the main point of the grounds for disciplinary action is as follows.

The plaintiffs are each of the above A.

As set forth in paragraph (1), while working in E City Resource Circulation Department, the Plaintiffs concluded a negotiated contract (hereinafter “instant negotiated contract”) with a specific company (F.F. hereinafter “F”) even if it is not possible to conclude a negotiated contract pursuant to Article 9 of the Act on Contracts to Which a Local Government Is a Party (hereinafter “Local Contract Act”) and Article 25 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act.

(2) Where a contract or other act which causes expenditure is performed, a project that is not authorized to handle administrative affairs even though it is requested to a department that handles contracting affairs and goes through legitimate procedures.