Text
1. On January 9, 2014, the National Labor Relations Commission committed unfair labor practices between the Plaintiffs and the Intervenor joining the Defendant.
Reasons
The Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor”) is a corporation established on July 1, 2003 as a non-profit corporation under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Employment and Labor based on the Act on the Establishment and Management of Public Interest Corporations and operates the social job support business for the unemployed.
Plaintiff
A is a person who was employed by the intervenor on June 5, 2006 and worked as the team leader at the growth support team, and the plaintiff B is a person who was notified of the termination of the employment contract on July 31, 2013 while the intervenor entered the employment contract with the intervenor on August 1, 201 and entered the contract as a contractual worker on July 31, 201.
Plaintiff
The Seoul General Trade Union (hereinafter referred to as the "Plaintiff trade union") is a regional unit labor union established on January 7, 2001 and established on January 7, 2001 for the organization of workers in Seoul.
“D” comprised of some of the workers belonging to the intervenors changed its structural structure to the division of the Plaintiff Trade Union on May 8, 2013, and the number of the members of the said division is 24.
The disciplinary action against Plaintiff B was imposed on May 10, 2013 by the Intervenor for his/her failure to perform his/her duties, etc., and the Plaintiff A was subject to the disciplinary action for February of his/her salary reduction on May 13, 2013. The disciplinary action against Plaintiff A was reduced by one month of salary reduction in the review procedure held on June 7, 2013.
On July 17, 2013, the Intervenor rejected the conversion of Plaintiff B to regular workers from the personnel committee of Plaintiff B. On July 18, 2013, the Intervenor notified Plaintiff B of the termination of the labor contract as of July 31, 2013.
1) On August 9, 2013, the Plaintiffs filed an application for remedy with the Seoul Regional Labor Relations Commission on the ground that each salary reduction disposition against Plaintiff B and A and the refusal of full-time conversion against Plaintiff B constituted an unfair disciplinary action and unfair labor practice involving unfair dismissal and disadvantage treatment. 2) Seoul Regional Labor Relations Commission (hereinafter “Seoul Regional Labor Relations Commission”) on October 7, 2013.