A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

On January 29, 2015, the Defendant sentenced Cheongju District Court to ten months of imprisonment with labor for the crime of interference with business, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence on July 22, 2015.

1. Around October 28, 2015, the Defendant of special intimidation against the victim C, on the ground that at the home of the Defendant located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Cheongju, the victim C (n, 61 years of age), the lessor, strings the Defendant into a different place by leaving the gas pipeline, and thereby, the victim’s “prising the victim.” In doing so, the Defendant threatened the victim by threatening the victim, who was a dangerous object that was set up in front of the Defendant’s house, with the victim’s house, on the ground that the victim C (n, f1 years of age), who was the lessor,

2. Around 14:45 October 28, 2015, the Defendant spited the victim E (a person aged 41) who is a neighboring party of the Defendant’s home located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seowon-si, with the same method as that set forth in paragraph (1) at the home of the Defendant’s home located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul, with a view to “a person who is fine for the police.” The Defendant spited the victim’s face by spiting it against the victim’s face.

3. Around October 29, 2015, the Defendant of special intimidation against the Victim F, on the ground that the Defendant demanded the Defendant to speak and use the gate late at night at night in front of the Defendant’s house located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Cheongju, the Defendant: (a) made a bruding theory, such as “this bruth, spathing, spathing, spathing,” which reads the victim’s face, and threatened the victim as if the victim were brud with a dangerous object installed in front of the Defendant’s house.”

4. From October 30, 2015, around 06:10 on October 30, 2015, the Defendant’s interference with business was the franchise for the reason that the Defendant did not know 20,000 won out of the Defendant’s wages at the I office operated by the victim H in the Gu of Cheongju-si from October 30, 2015 to October 06:30.

(1) pay the wages of the parties.