1. The Defendant: 13,322,50 won to Plaintiff A; 10,00,000 won to Plaintiff B; 49,237,500 won to Plaintiff C; and 39,145 to Plaintiff D.

1. 기초사실 원고 A은 ‘H’라는 상호로 라면, 스낵 도ㆍ소매업을, 원고 B는 ‘I’이라는 상호로 음료, 식품 도ㆍ소매업을, 원고 C는 ‘J’라는 상호로 라면 도매업을, 원고 D는 ‘K’이라는 상호로 라면, 스낵 도ㆍ소매업을, 원고 E은 ‘L’라는 상호로 라면 도ㆍ소매업을, 원고 F은 ‘M’라는 상호로 식품 도ㆍ소매업을 하는 사람이고, 피고는 음식료품 등을 판매하는 종합소매점 및 통신판매업 등을 목적으로 설립된 법인이다.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 (including each number, hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence 8, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to Plaintiff A’s claim

A. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments as to the grounds for the claim Gap's testimony from January 2, 2014 to February 15, 2014, it is recognized that the plaintiff supplied the product to the defendant if the plaintiff was a sn beam, etc. equivalent to KRW 25,85,000, and the plaintiff was paid KRW 12,532,50 of the price of supplied goods.

Therefore, barring any special circumstance, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff A the unpaid price of 13,322,50 won and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from May 14, 2014 to the date of full payment after the delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case.

B. The Defendant alleged that the Plaintiff did not have any transaction with the Defendant since January 23, 2014, and that there was no personal transaction with the O. However, the entries in the evidence Nos. 3 and 9-1 are insufficient to recognize the Defendant’s above assertion, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Rather, in full view of the statements in the evidence Nos. 1, 10-2, 3, 11, 13, and 15, and the overall purport of the arguments in the testimony of the witness N andO, the O is a network P between the deceased who is a real operator of the defendant and the actual operator of the defendant.