1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the judgment of the court of first instance is to dismiss the “founded ground for certification” of the second 10th of the judgment as “founded ground for recognition,” and the ground for the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to that of the court of first instance, except for adding the following judgments, thereby citing it as it is in accordance

2. Additional determination

A. The plaintiff asserts to the effect that the defendant damaged the baby No. 26 and No. 27 while treating the defendant's 25 side of the baby.

However, according to the result of the first instance court’s entrustment of medical records to the head of E Hospital, the Defendant did not have any record of treating the baby Nos. 25, 27, and 22 or 24, and the Plaintiff’s above assertion is deemed to have been limited to the temporary landing of the baby Nos. 22 or 26, and the narrow charging of the baby No. 27 and the final charging of the baby No. 27, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge the Plaintiff’s above assertion. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s above assertion is without merit.

B. The plaintiff alleged to the effect that the radiation X-ray film taken by the defendant was fabricated at the time of internal investigation, but there is no evidence to prove this, and the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.