Defendant

A Imprisonment for eight months, for six months, for six months, and for four months, for each of the defendants B.

except that this shall not apply.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A The owner who actually operates the "G amusement room" on the 3th floor in the East Sea, the owner who actually operates the "G amusement room" on the F3th floor in the above Sea, the head of the office in charge of the installation of machinery in the above game room, management of employees, public relations, money exchange business, etc., and the spouse of the defendant A, who

No one shall engage in the business of exchanging or arranging money exchange or repurchase results obtained through the use of game products.

Nevertheless, from December 12, 2015 to December 19, 2015, the Defendants conspired to establish 50 game rooms in the above game room and request an unspecified number of customers to exchange points obtained through the use of game products installed in the above game room, and 10% of the points obtained through the above game was deducted from 5,000 to 10% of the points obtained through the above game.

As above, Defendants conspired to exchange tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Each police statement made to H and I;

1. Statement of seizure of each police;

1. 112. List of reported cases;

1. The details of the registration of changes in the juvenile game providing business (Glols), monthly sales contract, copies of account transactions, the ledger of registration (report), the details of the game industry, the details of receipt of I text messages, and the contents of each text message received;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (the attachment of documents in the dynamic change of the owner of the business, the attachment of game equipment notes, the counter telephone investigation of the owner of the building, the result of the Defendants' digital evidence analysis of mobile phones, the salpha

1. Article 44(1)2 and Article 32(1)7 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry and Article 30 of the Criminal Act are applicable to the Defendants’ choice of criminal facts and punishment.