A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 2013, the Defendant, using a written guarantee by a foreign bank (B/G) that was forged, attempted to induce a victim D who lacks knowledge of English and financial affairs from a foreign bank, to receive money from the victim by deceiving the victim as if he/she had induced investment money from a foreign bank.

On August 21, 2013, the Defendant shown the F Office, a mobile phone assembly company that is the victim of the victim in Gumi-si, Gumi-si, that is, the U.K. (BACRS) bank issuance guarantee, and “B is engaged in the business of entrusting the management of financial assets as the head of the GG in charge of operating financial assets. 50 days after 450,000, 50 million U.S. (71.3 billion won at the exchange rate) entered with H(I) due to lack of customs fees. The Defendant found an investor as “H(I).” On the face of 200 million won, the Defendant introduced I to the victim more than 45 days after 45 days, and I, around October 2013, concluded that “I will enter the victim with the phone fund amount to KRW 75 billion.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was engaged mainly in the construction business after the retirement of industrial high schools and did not have any means of engaging in the entrusted business of operating financial assets, and both Defendant and I did not have been engaged in the entrusted business of operating financial assets. At the time, I was charged with the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) in the Suwon District Court, and continued trial after being charged with the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud), and the Defendant was also aware of the fact that he was prosecuted and tried to continue trial. Since the guarantee that the Defendant presented to the victim was forged, even if receiving money from the victim, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability

The defendant deceivings the victim and is under his control.