Defendant

A Imprisonment of five years, Defendant B and C, Defendant F and I imprisonment of three years, respectively, and Defendant G, H and J.

Punishment of the crime

[Defendant E] On April 7, 2010, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced one year of imprisonment for fraud and two years of suspended execution, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 15th day of the same month.

Defendant

A is the representative of the AI company, who has been in charge of attracting investments and distributing dividends with AJ, the representative director of the above company, and Defendant B is the financial director of the above AI sub-head office, Defendant C is the managing director of the above head office, Defendant D is the head of the above head office, Defendant E is the legal adviser of the above head office, Defendant F, G, H, and I is the highest business operator, Defendant J is the head of the above company, Defendant J is the head of the above company, Defendant J is the higher business operator, Defendant K is the head of the above company, Defendant C is the head of the above company, and Defendant L is the lower-class head of the above H, the lower-class head of the above company, and Defendant M is the head of the above company.

1. Defendant A, B, and C’s fraud with the above AJ, etc.: (a) if the investors pay 10 million won or more at least one unit of investment, the investors are able to generate a large amount of profit through the exchange difference transaction called “EEX M&E” with the said investment money; (b) if investments are made for six months, the investors are paid 8% of the principal amount per month; and (c) if investments are made for six months, the principal amount shall be paid after six months; and (d) if investments are made for twelve months, the principal amount shall be paid for 9% of the principal amount per month, and the principal amount shall be paid after twelve months, the investors are invited to receive the investment under the pretext of investment; (d) Defendant A is the representative of the above company’s additional office; and (e) Defendant B is in charge of the financial affairs such as attracting investors and distribution at the head office of the above company; and (e) Defendant C is engaged in the affairs such as inducing investors to receive and distribute investments from the said head office

However, through the foreign exchange difference transaction, the defendants actually generated the profit of the high rate agreed upon by the defendants, and the above profit is not sufficient.