1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The grounds for admitting the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the parts amended or additionally determined under paragraph (2) below, and thus, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. Parts to be modified or additionally determined;

A. (1) On the second and second pages of the first instance judgment, the portion of the amendment is as follows: “The 5th and the 6th following is changed to the following: “The National Participating Elector’s team was organized and the competition was conducted.” (2) the portion of the 8th sentence of the first instance judgment was added to “the recommendation was made” of the 14th sentence of the 8th sentence of the 14th sentence.

“A written agreement signed by the Plaintiff includes not only the Plaintiff’s absolute winning of the decision of the Party on the recommendation of the candidate for the instant constituency, but also the purport of not raising any objection to the process and result of the instant committee’s decision.” 3) The part of the first instance judgment, “The Plaintiff’s failure to pay a certain amount of contribution should be excluded from political and Do responsibilities,” which is written within the overall title of No. 8 of No. 9 of the first instance judgment, is changed to “The Plaintiff asserted that he was able to win a candidate’s recommendation, but did not withdraw from the public opinion poll, or that he went away from the candidate’s recommendation because he was in collusion with Defendant B, but there is no evidence to acknowledge it.” (b) The part to determine additional amount 1) The Plaintiff was unable to provide a regional principle on April 3, 2014.

Even if the party constitution, the party rules, and the guidelines for the central party of the defendant Shinnuri party, decided on April 9, 2014 to select a candidate by 100% public opinion poll method for the instant constituency, and the above regional allocation principle was abolished.

However, the defendant's party constitution or the regulations on recommending candidates for public office (see, e.g., the fifth sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance) does not change before or after April 9, 2014.