beta
Text
Defendant
A Decision 2-
(a)for 6 months of imprisonment with prison labor for each of the crimes, 500,000 won and the remaining crimes;
Reasons
On January 14, 2016, Defendant A (Defendant A) was sentenced to three years of suspension of execution on January 22, 2016 to imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. in the Gangnam Branch of the Chuncheon District Court on January 14, 2016, and the said judgment became final and conclusive.
1. On March 2, 2016, at the main point of “F” located in Gangnam-si E on March 2, 2016, the Defendant was suffering from living together of the Defendant with the Victim G (F, 45 years old), whether the Defendant “I am, Chewing, I am fri and friened” to the Defendant.
The term "buckbucks" refers to a food that makes the victim's chest part of the chests of the victim several times, and as a result, the victim walked the part of the buckbucks on several occasions, and bucks the victim's head head and skes for about two weeks, and the victim was in need of approximately two weeks' treatment, and the bucks of the bucks, etc.
2. Fraud;
A. On January 1, 2014, the Defendant saw that 100,000 won of taxi fares were paid as if he / she gets aboard the I taxi driven by the victim H in the vicinity of the Dong-dong-dong of Gangseo-si.
However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the taxi fee.
The Defendant had the victim drive the said taxi again in the vicinity of the terminal located in the Gangseo-si, Chungcheongnam-si via the Yancheon-gun, the Defendant did not pay KRW 100,000,000, even though he had the victim drive the said taxi.
Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, obtained property benefits equivalent to the same amount of money.
B. On February 15, 2016, the Defendant: (a) 00:26 on February 15, 2016, she was working as if the Defendant were to take the victim L in and pay a taxi fee to the M taxi in the vicinity of the Knung-si J of Gangseo-si.
However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the taxi fee.
The defendant had the victim drive the above taxi again through the Gangseo-gu, Gangwon-do, Gangnam-gu, Gangwon-do, and did not pay 63,840 won of the taxi fee even though he/she had the victim drive the above taxi again to the same Si/Gun/Dong.
Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim to gain property benefits equivalent to the same amount.