logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2015.01.22 2014고단1856
사기등
Text

1. Defendant A

(a) The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months;

B. Embezzlements against F among the facts charged in the instant case

Reasons

Criminal facts

To the extent that the facts charged in the indictment do not disadvantage the defendant's exercise of his/her right to defense, some amendments were made according to the facts obtained through the examination of evidence.

Defendant

On May 26, 2010, A was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the District Court of Mabu District on May 26, 201 and completed the execution of the sentence on May 1, 201.

1. Defendant A and Defendant A (loan B) received a loan request from Defendant B to arrange for a loan, and the first priority was notified that there was a method of disposing of the loan immediately after purchasing the loan by installment and then making the loan.

Accordingly, at around 16:00 on March 18, 2013, Defendant B purchased benz E300 in its own name at the Doro-dong 946-1, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Doro-dong, and concluded a “automobile installment agreement” with respect to the car as if Defendant B were to purchase and use the car, while Defendant B had a certain employee of the victim’s “Yoman Capital Co., Ltd., Ltd., as if he were to purchase and use it.

However, at the time, the Defendants did not have the intention or ability to repay the loans.

Nevertheless, Defendant B, by deceiving the employees of the victim, required the victim to pay 69,400,000 won to the said passenger car sales company, and received the said passenger car delivery.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to induce the victim to acquire the pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 69.4 million.

2. Defendant A

A. The Defendant: (a) received a request from F and G to arrange a loan; and (b) in fact, despite the knowledge that the Defendant had no intent or ability to repay the loan even if he/she purchased a vehicle with the loan borrowed from F, he/she purchased a vehicle under F’s name with a loan borrowed in the name of F and sold the vehicle immediately after purchasing the vehicle.

1 The defendant around December 31, 2012, at any used motor vehicle store located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, cargo loaded in F in the name of F.

arrow