Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On October 11, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and two months at the Ulsan District Court for fraud, which became final and conclusive on February 8, 2013.

The defendant received a loan from the victim B (the age of 46) and then purchased a vehicle in installments using the relevant documents, and then disposed of and acquired them. D plays a role of introducing the victim to the defendant, making a false representation as to the possibility of lending to the victim, and C bears a role of responding to the purport that it is true that he/she received a telephone call from facsimile transmission or installment loan company and received a confirmation call from the victim, and that he/she made an application for installment loan by pretending that he/she was the victim to the employee in charge of the company.

Defendant and C, at the end of March 2012, the end of Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, 2012, concluded that “I will have D borrow KRW 150 million for the loan to the victim by means of borrowing the corporation from the corporation’s name or purchasing the vehicle in installment after purchasing the vehicle in the name of the corporation and disposing of it.”

On April 6, 2012, the Defendant and C, together with D, obtained a victim’s personal seal impression, certificate of personal seal, etc. from the victim at a multi-sports office located in Ulsan-gu Multi-dong, Ulsan-gu, U.S. from the victim who believed it, and purchased a Gbee car by obtaining a loan of KRW 20 million from the Hyundai Capital Co., Ltd. using the above seal imprint, etc. from the said employee at the vehicle trading company where the trade name in Ulsan-gu, U.S. is unknown at the location of the victim’s personal seal impression, etc.

However, at the time, the defendant, C, and D purchased and disposed of a motor vehicle with a installment loan in the name of the victim, and did not think that the disposal price would be consumed for the purpose of their own living expenses, etc., and that it would not be paid to the victim.