logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.11.23 2016고합113
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(알선영업행위등)등
Text

The crimes of violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (Good Offices, etc.) and obstruction of the execution of official duties.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 17, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for two years and six months and four years of suspended execution with prison labor for violating the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, etc. at Seoul Western District Court on February 17, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 25, 20

"Violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (Good Offices, etc.)": The Defendant, along with C and D, recruited a male who wants the so-called so-called "conditional South" using a cell phone hosting display method using a cell phone junife with the c and D having become aware of the fact that he/she had become aware of F (15 years of age), G (15 years of age) in the middle of February 2015, and had him/her engage in sexual traffic with the above juveniles.

On February 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) contacted a sex-purchase male through F’s cellular phone hold at the second floor coffee shop located in the Gui-si Mari-si; (b) contacted a sex-purchase male in the vicinity of the said coffee shop; and (c) contacted a sex-purchase male in the same way as G’s mobile phone; (d) sent a sexual intercourse with G at the above coffee shop and delivered 1,50,000 won received as compensation from the said juveniles to D in the same way for about 16 days thereafter; and (c) thereby, the Defendant acquired profits worth KRW 2,40,000,000 in total from the said juveniles in the same way, in collusion with D and C to arrange the act of purchasing child or juvenile sex for business.

On July 11, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 04:27 on July 11, 2015, the Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties Act: (b) at the aftermath of the Namyang-si, the Defendant, along with his desire to obtain confirmation on the contents of the report from the police officer affiliated with the I Zone of the Namyang Police Station I District of the Namyang-gu Police Station, called “I would like to go off without a separate line,” and (c) at his hand, her body was pushed back to the police (K) who was placed in a nearby place while threateninging him to go back, and walking to the police (K) at the same time as he would end up with his drinking, and (d) on the handling of the 112 reported cases by police officers.

arrow