Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

When the defendant does not pay a fine, 50,000 won shall be converted into one day.

Punishment of the crime

1. 피고인은 2016. 4. 10. 10:55 경 울산 중구 C에 있는 ‘D’ 3 층 팰리스 홀에서, 결혼식과 아무런 관계가 없어 축의금을 낸 사실이 없음에도 마치 축의금을 낸 것처럼 행세하며 축의금 접수 대에서 피해자 E로부터 식권 2 장을 교부 받아 답례 품인 현금 2만 원과 교환하여 이를 편취하였다.

2. On April 10, 2016, the Defendant obtained the head of 20,00 won of cash, which is a cash of 20,000 won, from the victim F in the same place (hereinafter referred to as “catus”) in the same manner, and obtained the head of 20,000 won from the victim F in exchange for money.

3. 피고인은 2016. 4. 16. 12:08 경 같은 장소 팰리스 홀에서, 같은 방법으로 축의금 접수 대에서 피해자 G로부터 식권 5 장을 교부 받아 답례 품인 현금 5만 원과 교환하여 이를 편취하였다.

4. 피고인은 2016. 4. 17. 11:00 경 같은 장소 팰리스 홀에서, 같은 방법으로 축의금 접수 대에서 피해자 H으로부터 식권 2 장을 교부 받아 답례 품인 현금 2만 원과 교환하여 가려 다가 웨딩 홀의 종업원에게 발각되는 바람에 뜻을 이루지 못하고 미수에 그쳤다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of the statutes governing crime photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 1, 2, and 347 (1) (Selection of Penalty) and (4) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime: Articles 352 and 347 (1) (Selection of Penalty) of the Criminal Act;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. In full view of the fact that the reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract the workhouses are against the accused’s wrong recognition, the actual amount of fraud is not much high, and the Defendant’s history, surrounding environment, economic conditions, etc., the punishment as set forth in the Disposition shall be determined as ordered.