Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative of the E E’s trade name, and the defendant B is the business operator indicated in the business registration certificate of the said event with the denial by the defendant A, who employs part-time students and instructs part-time students to work and manages the funds of the said event.

around September 2014, the Defendants supplied the manpower of Aarbrates in the wedding ceremony, which is proceeding in the subparagraph of “Gwab” in the “Gwab,” which is located in the “Gwab, Ansan-si.” On October 2014, the Defendants attempted to receive the food tickets equivalent to the food fee imposed in proportion to the number of tickets received by Aarbrates and the number of tickets received by Aarbrates by pretending the visitors (victims) in the operation of the said Gwabing system, except for the personnel expenses to be paid to Aarbrates, around October 2014.

From the beginning of November 2014 to December 14, 2014, the Defendants made it possible for the Defendants to receive food rights by pretending that she was a customer from the receipt stand of her vaga and vaga and vagabonds, while the instant Gwa Holdings proceeds with the examples of the victims, the victims, and H collected the food rights.

However, the above food rights, which H joined, are the right of food granted by the victims as if they were the visitors, and are not the case where they are exchanged with the actual return items. However, the Defendants, despite that the above food rights are not the case where they are exchanged with the correct return items, the Defendants, in the quantity of food rights that they actually exchanged with the return items and received as a truth, were known in the G Holdings settlement room, so that they can be reflected in the settlement of the victims' food expenses, thereby taking the property amounting to 282 copies of food rights on December 14, 2014 and 9780,00 won in total, from the victims indicated in the attached list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ 1.