logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015. 09. 04. 선고 2014나54577 판결
체납자가 자신 명의의 부동산을 처에게 증여한 행위는 사해행위에 해당함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Gwangju District Court 2013 Ghana 75179

Title

The act of making a donation to the wife of the real estate in his name constitutes a fraudulent act.

Summary

Contracts to which a delinquent taxpayer donated real estate under his/her name to the wife shall be revoked as a fraudulent act, and the registration of transfer of ownership in his/her name shall be cancelled due to such restitution.

Related statutes

Article 406 of the Civil Code / [Right of Revocation]

Cases

2014Na5457 Revocation of Fraudulent Act

Plaintiff, Appellant

Korea

Defendant, appellant and appellant

Category ○ ○

Judgment of the first instance court

Gwangju District Court Decision 2013Na75179 Decided November 25, 2014

Conclusion of Pleadings

July 17, 2015

Imposition of Judgment

4, 2015

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of claim

With respect to real property listed in the Schedule:

A. Revocation of a gift agreement concluded on July 20, 201 between the Defendant and Kim △△△△△, and:

B. The Defendant’s receipt on July 24, 2012 to Kim △△△△ branch office of the Gwangju District Court’s Netcheon Branch Office

The procedure for cancellation registration of ownership transfer registration completed by ○○○○○○.

2. Purport of appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

Reasons

The reason why the court's explanation concerning this case is the same as the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except that the court of first instance dismisses "the court of first instance" as "the court of first instance," and the "the plaintiff" of the same second part as "The △△△△△," which is the same as the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, citing this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be accepted for the reasons, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges

Judges Song Young-young

Judges Hun-Ba

Judges are unable to sign and seal on a new leave of absence;

arrow