1. As to the crimes of subparagraphs 1 and 1, 2017 order 2017 order 104 order 1 and 201 order 127 order 1, Defendant A, Defendant A, six months of imprisonment.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On October 7, 2015, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years in the period of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Changwon District Court's Busan Branch Branch for six months on October 7, 2015, and such judgment became final and conclusive on October 15, 2015.

Defendant

C On March 23, 2017, the Busan District Court was sentenced to imprisonment of 8 months for fraud, and the suspended sentence of 2 years was finalized on March 31, 2017.

[Defendant] 2017 Highest 104 [Defendant]

1. Defendant B’s joint crime committed by the Defendants was serving as the head of the G Trade Union’s branch office, and was retired on April 18, 2016, and Defendant C and Defendant A are people who did not have a certain occupation.

Defendant

C and Defendant B introduced a person who wants to be employed in G labor union by Defendant A and offered access to the person who wants to be employed in G labor union to receive money in return for job placement expenses.

Defendant

A around May 8, 2015, at the "J" page in the I hotel located in H of the Busan L, Seo-gu, Busan, around May 8, 2015, the victim K was sent to HID (North Korean co-ordinator) upon the request of the power agency to find employment.

For entertainment expenses for employment, 25 million won is offered as a day-to-day employment.

Defendant B refers to the head of Gu's branch of G Nowon-do, and Defendant B is the head of Gu's branch of G Nowon-do, and if he works temporarily for only three months, he/she will be employed as a regular worker for which he/she is issued a certificate of labor union thereafter.

Defendant C is difficult to find employment on the negorithm.

is waiting for trust and good faith.

The phrase “at least 25 million won as entertainment expenses,” and the phrase “at least 25 million won was admitted to the G Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Board, and was made a false statement as if he/she would be employed as regular workers.

However, even if the Defendants received the above money from the injured party, they thought to use the money for personal purposes rather than for employment solicitation, and there was no intention or ability to have the injured party employed the full-time worker to whom the G Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment was issued.

Defendants belong to this.