A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 3, 2017, the Defendant: (a) received a report from the police officer No. 112 to the effect that the Defendant was a disturbance for the subject of a disturbance for the subject of a report, and (b) was forced to refrain from getting the Defendant into the roadway under the influence of alcohol; (c) stated that “I Y, I Y, I am, I am bling, I am, I am bling, I am raising, I am bling, I am sat, I am sat, I am sat, I am satd, etc.” on both hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of not less than Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code (which is the previous but is against the law, circumstances, results, etc. of the crime).