Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, for each of the defendants B.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

Criminal facts (2017 Highest 907)

1. Defendant A

A. An offender with respect to self-control on February 22, 2016 has also been under control by the police while engaging in sexual traffic arranging business by employing male chief G, female employees H, I, etc. at the “F” business located in Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City from January 28, 2016 to February 22, 2016.

On April 20, 2016, the Defendant submitted a false lease agreement and agreement that he/she received from D, instead of the above control case, and received a proposal to grant a fine to the actual owner of the business, and agreed to do money between several months. On April 22, 2016, the Defendant appeared at the investigation station in Seoul Nowon-gu and the J Team office and made a false statement to the effect that he/she is the actual owner of the business at the “F” place, the circumstance during which he/she was in charge of the investigation into the said case, the circumstance during which he/she leased the business place, the method of business, etc., and submitted a false lease agreement and agreement that he/she received from D, and was prosecuted by the Seoul Northern District Court in the said case, but made a false statement to the same effect.

As such, the Defendant concealed D, the actual business owner of the “F” establishment, thereby allowing D to escape from committing a crime punishable by a fine or heavier punishment.

B. After the control as of August 5, 2016, D was controlled as paragraph (a), D was also subject to the control at the police station around August 5, 2016, when engaging in commercial sex acts at a “F” business after employing one female employees L, M, N, M, M, mon, and one other, and resumeing his/her business, and engaging in commercial sex acts at the “F” business.

On August 7, 2016, the Defendant received a request from D to request the actual owner to conduct an investigation instead of this time, and consented to the request. On August 31, 2016, the Defendant was present at the living order of the Seoul National Police Agency and the PP office around Seoul National Police Agency around August 31, 2016 and stated Q Q Q who was investigating the instant case to the effect that he was the actual owner of the F’s business.