1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] Defendant B was sentenced to one year and nine months of imprisonment and three years of suspended execution as of September 30, 2016 by the Busan District Court, on September 22, 2016, due to a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Intermediating, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts, and thus under suspended execution.

[Criminal facts]

1. Crimes related to the operation of “E”;

A. Defendant B, as the actual operator of a commercial sex trafficking business establishment with the trade name “E” from the 5th floor in Kimhae-si, Kim Jong-si, brought about 70% of the monthly net profit. Defendant A is an employee of the said business establishment from August 2015 to May 2016, and Defendant B is the president of the said business establishment, who, from June 2016, manages the business of the said business establishment as a lessee under the name of the said business establishment, reported the business performance to Defendant B, and who, when regulating, reported the business performance to Defendant B, who agreed to undergo an investigation and punishment as an unemployment owner and received 30% of the monthly net profit as a benefit.

From August 2015 to May 16, 2017, the Defendants, along with the above “E”, employed Defendant A, and had Defendant A report the “G” on commercial sex acts, and received KRW 7 to 110,000 as the price for commercial sex acts for male customers, and ordered four employees, etc. of Chinese nationality, including female employees H, to engage in a similar sexual intercourse, under which the male customer’s sexual organ is shakingd by hand.

As a result, Defendants conspired to act as commercial sex acts such as brokerage.

B. Defendant B’s offender also had been an employee who had had the intent to arrange sexual traffic by engaging in the business at the above E business around June 2016.

A A’s proposal to the effect that “I would give 30% of the net profits of each month of employing a width as an employee instead of being punished as a business owner at the time of crackdown, and a fine is imposed in full.” If A’s control is placed on an investigative agency, it is false that he/she is the unemployment of the said sexual traffic business establishment.