Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On December 10, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years on November 23, 2015 by imprisonment with prison labor for the preparation of a private document for qualification at the Suwon Flag Flag, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 23, 2015.

On August 9, 2012, the Defendant: (a) forged the shareholder list of C; (b) the copy of the provisional meeting of shareholders; and (c) submitted it to the Suwon District Court registry; and (d) registered the Defendant as a representative director and in-house director of the said company; (b) made an application for termination of the provisional disposition against D and 16 parcels of the said company (97Kahap 2831 Real Estate Disposition) on May 10, 2013; and (c) made an application for termination of the provisional disposition against D and 16 parcels of the said company at the site of Ansan-si, the land of which the said company made the provisional disposition (97Kahap 2831 Real Estate Disposition); and (d) made an application for termination with the qualification of the representative director of C, which is a private document related to rights and obligations, and submitted the application for termination to the public official under the jurisdiction of the Seoul Western District Court on June 10, 2013.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Previous records: Application of each copy of the judgment;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Articles 232 (Occupancy of private document prepared for qualification qualification), 234, 232 (Occupancy of private document prepared for qualification qualification) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act shall be determined as per the order, taking into consideration the equity in the case where a judgment of reason for sentencing becomes final and conclusive at the same time with the case where the judgment is to be rendered.