1. The Defendants jointly share the amount of KRW 21,383,238, and KRW 1,00,000 and each of the above amounts to Plaintiff A.

Basic Facts

A. On August 7, 2014, Defendant C driven a D D dump truck (hereinafter “dump truck”) under the influence of alcohol content 0.178% on a dump truck (hereinafter “dump truck”) on the right side of the said truck (hereinafter “the instant accident”) and suffered injury, such as the removal of dump dump dump dump dump, the right side of which requires treatment for about 16 weeks from the right side of the instant truck in accordance with the green signal of the pedestrian signal apparatus, while Defendant C made a non-protected left-hand turn from the right side of the instant truck at the right side of the instant truck (hereinafter “the instant accident”), and Defendant C sustained injury, such as the removal of dump dump dump dump dump from the right side of the instant truck, requiring treatment for about 16 weeks.

B. Plaintiff B is the husband of Plaintiff A, and Defendant A Electric Industry Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) is the owner of a sea-going vehicle.

[Reasons for Recognition] Fact-finding, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including a provisional number; hereinafter the same shall apply), and the purport of the whole pleadings is acknowledged as above. The accident in this case occurred due to negligence in driving without properly examining the front door while under the influence of alcohol by defendant C. Thus, the defendant C is the above tortfeasor, and the defendant company is jointly liable to compensate the plaintiffs for damages caused by the accident in this case as the owner of a sea-going vehicle.

In principle, the period of calculating the scope of liability for damages shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than the last month and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded.

The calculation of the current value at the time of the accident shall be based on the reduction rate of 5/12 percent per month to deduct the interim interest.

According to the statements in the evidence No. 9-6 to 13, 16 through 35, and the evidence No. 11-1 through 3 of the evidence No. 11-3, the plaintiff A may recognize the fact that he/she paid KRW 5,813,015 to the medical expenses incurred from the accident of this case.

According to the statement of Nos. 9-1, 2, 5, 13-1, 2, and 9-1, 13-2, the accident of this case.