beta
Text
1. The part against Plaintiff A in the judgment of the first instance is revoked.
2. The Defendant limited to Plaintiff A on December 2, 2014.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Plaintiff A is a person appointed as a local administrative secretary for the military on August 2, 1978 and served as a head of D military administrative support division (administrative class V) from July 29, 201 to July 3, 2014; Plaintiff B is a person appointed as a local administrative secretary for the military on June 2, 1992 and served as D military administrative support and administrative support assistant (administrative class VI) from July 2, 2013 to July 3, 2014.
B. On November 14, 2014, the Governor of the Jeollabuk-do Personnel Committee decided on the dismissal of Plaintiff A due to the following disciplinary reasons. Accordingly, on December 2, 2014, the Defendant issued a disciplinary action against Plaintiff A (hereinafter “instant dismissal disposition”).
▣ 징계사유(이하 ‘원고 A의 징계사유’라 하고, 순번으로 특정한다.)
1. On January 2013, 2014, Plaintiff A, while holding a work performance rating committee, with the knowledge that he/she was the head of the office division and the head of the Gun with the authority of evaluating the work performance rating of the public officials under his/her control while holding a work performance rating committee (2:00 on January 27, 2014), he/she obtained approval from the head of the Gun at around 17:50 on January 27, 2014 without reflecting all the evaluation of the final person determined by the head of the Gun through consultation with the head of the office division, who was aware that he/she was the head of the office division and the head of the Gun with the authority of evaluating the work performance rating of the public officials under his/her control, while holding a work performance rating committee (28:00 on January 28, 2014) and presenting opinions so that the order separately indicated by the chairperson can be reflected in the remarks column of the meeting materials, which is not prescribed in the related statutes, but reflected in the final order of the head of the Gun.
at the meeting of the Work Performance Evaluation Committee.