Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

Upon receipt of a request from G to exchange cashier's checks of KRW 1,000,000 forged from G, A contacted Defendant D with Defendant D, and exchanged Defendant B and Defendant B with cash through Defendant C with the knowledge of that fact, and conspired in order to divide the exchange money.

Defendant

A around 13:00 on February 15, 2013, around 13:00, at the office 401 office of the H Building in Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, A requested the exchange of the forged cashier’s checks stated in the column of the check amount (1,00,000,000 won) from the above G, “1,00,000 won (one hundred million won)” in the column of the issue date, “21 December 2012” in the column of the issue date, and “K of the J Branch Office of the Bank of Korea in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Korea, the J Branch Office of the Bank of Korea,” and requested Defendant D and B to exchange them properly.

In addition, at around 16:30 on February 15, 2013, Defendant B met Defendant C at the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Lda; Defendant C’s checks drawn up to Defendant C and told Defendant C that “I am able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able

On February 18, 2013, at the J branch in Jung-gu, Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, Defendant C demanded the employees of the above bank to exchange the falsified cashier’s checks with two 500,000,000 won cashier’s checks as if they were actually issued.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to present a forged cashier's check and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The police statement of M;

1. A written confirmation of forgery of a cashier's check;

1. Photographs of the criminal scene;

1. A criminal investigation report (suspect mobile analysis report);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each protocol of seizure, each list of seized articles and all the list of seized articles;

1. Relevant provisions concerning facts constituting an offense;