1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 9, 2016, the Plaintiff entered a company B (hereinafter “B”) and worked as a quality controller on May 13, 2013, and filed an application for medical care benefits with the Defendant on November 9, 2016, after receiving a diagnosis of “cerebrovassis, steering disorder, paralysis, care disorder, and in detail unknown islands,” following the diagnosis of thropical disorder (hereinafter “the disease of this case”).

B. On February 20, 2017, the Defendant rendered a decision on non-approval (hereinafter “instant disposition”) based on the result of the determination by the Minor Disease Determination Committee that the instant injury and disease does not constitute an occupational disease as a result of the recognition of proximate causal relation with the Plaintiff.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 5, 7, 9 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion that there was no special health problem except that he/she was relatively young at the age of 42 and 5 at the time of the outbreak of the injury and disease of this case. The plaintiff worked as quality controller at various civil construction sites in addition to B, he/she seems to have experienced overwork and stress. The plaintiff, who is in exclusive charge of the quality control duties to be performed by 3 persons under the law, carried out the excessive duties, and experienced considerable overwork and stress in the process. Due to the characteristics of the work site and laboratory, 3 hours a day of daily work to prepare documents in addition to the regular work hours at the construction site and laboratory, and even on holidays, he/she has to perform quality control duties, such as materials inspection, supervision team, material supply center, and trial work.