beta
Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. The judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged that the defendant was guilty of the facts charged, or of misunderstanding the legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts or misunderstanding the legal principles, even though the defendant was leading the victim only, and the victim was seated in the state of dub, and the victim was not able to do so because he was in the original state of the victim's right arms.
B. The sentence of the lower court (2 million won of a fine) is excessively unreasonable.
2. Determination
A. In full view of the following circumstances, which can be seen by the lower court’s judgment as to the assertion of mistake of facts and misapprehension of legal principles, i.e., the victim’s statement at the lower court that the Defendant came to go beyond the breath by cutting balth, ② According to the CCTV images submitted, the victim’s balp, which the Defendant was taking advantage of the superior advantage of power, entered into the balp, and the victim appears to have come to go beyond the balp, and ③ it is difficult to deem that the victim was under a shoulder treatment due to symptoms other than the balpitis before committing the crime, it can be sufficiently recognized that the Defendant inflicted bodily injury by balping the victim.
The defendant's above assertion is without merit.
B. In light of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is deemed appropriate and is too unreasonable, and the Defendant’s above assertion is not reasonable, on the grounds that the Defendant’s judgment on the assertion of unfair sentencing was based on the following facts: (a) the degree of injury inflicted by the victim was not written against North Korean defectors; (b) there was no special change in circumstances that could change the sentencing after the lower judgment; and (c) the Defendant’s age, character, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime
3.