The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

The acquittal portion

1. The summary of the facts charged was that, around March 17, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 23:10 on March 17, 2014, at the time of making a U.S. cab driving on the front side of Gangnam-gu Seoul, the FBelgium car that the victim E was on board was in danger of a dangerous internship, and thus, (b) the Defendant was in sight of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Accordingly, the victim injured the defendant's chest one time by hand, and caused the defendant's injury on the credit sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sules

2. The judgment is based on the victim's statement and medical certificate as evidence that the defendant, as shown in the facts charged, has inflicted an injury on the victim, such as salt pans, tensions, etc. in need of two weeks of treatment.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the record: ① the victim was arrested as a flagrant offender on March 17, 2014 and submitted a diagnosis to an investigation agency on March 20, 2014, and the victim visited a hospital on March 25, 2014 and was issued a diagnosis certificate; the process of issuing the certificate is not only the question, but it is difficult to conclude that the victim suffered injury on the medical certificate due to the instant accident in light of the temporal gap between the date of occurrence and the date of issuance of the certificate of diagnosis; ② the victim was arrested as a flagrant offender immediately after the instant case, and the victim was arrested as a flagrant offender, and at the time of being investigated, the victim was suffering from a little amount of damage on the medical certificate of this case.

The victim and witness stated that there was physical contact with each other to the extent that they were blicked, and that there was 8 days after the victim was 8 days after this case occurred.