1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the amount ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1) The F is deemed a G bus around 18:45 on April 28, 2013 (hereinafter “instant bus”).

2) The bus stops in front of the water station located in 19 on the water station in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si. 2) The bus stops in front of the water station in front of the water station with a very complicated population, which led to the driver’s duty of care to safely drive the bus and prevent accidents in advance by driving the bus in front of the water station.

3) Nevertheless, due to occupational negligence, F neglected the duty of care under the above 2 (b) and neglected to enter the bus stops, and, at the right side of the bus of this case, the Plaintiff’s left side part of the bus of this case was lowered and walked down to the right side of the bus of this case, and the Plaintiff A’s right side side side of the bus of this case was over the back wheels of the right side.

(4) Due to the instant accident, Plaintiff A suffered from injury, such as tension damage, and cut off the right part to the right part, due to the instant accident. Plaintiff B is the husband of Plaintiff A, Plaintiff C, D, and E are the children of Plaintiff A, and the Defendant is the insurer who entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to the instant bus.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1-9, 12, 13, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 3 (including branch numbers, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is an insurer who has entered into a mutual aid agreement with the bus of this case, and is liable for the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case.

C. However, in full view of the developments leading up to the occurrence of the instant accident, etc., the Plaintiff A may be recognized as having caused the instant accident, etc. due to the collision between the Plaintiff and the road, and such circumstance appears to have influenced the occurrence and expansion of the damages caused by the instant accident. As such, the Plaintiff A’s negligence is considered.