logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2015. 12. 24. 선고 2015두51026 판결
(심리불속행)[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2015-Nu-39899 ( August 26, 2015)

Title

(Resceptic Conduct)

Summary

It is reasonable to view that the money of this case paid to the heir due to the death of the decedent at the workplace of the decedent was paid as retirement allowance upon the death of the decedent because the decedent was in the position of representative director, and therefore, barring any special circumstance, it shall be regarded as inherited property pursuant to the main sentence of Article

Related statutes

Article 10 of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

While examining the grounds of appeal in comparison with the records of this case and the judgment of the court below, the ground of appeal on the grounds of appeal is not deemed to have been rejected or not.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow