logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.04.15 2014가단168461
대여금등
Text

1. As to the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A Co., Ltd.: 66,211,399 won and 32,348,135 won among them.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff's successor's claim

(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;

(b) Defendant 1: Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);

(c) Defendant 2: Judgment on deemed confession (Articles 208(3)2 and 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. On December 4, 2014, while the Plaintiff’s claim was pending in the instant lawsuit, transferred to the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor the claim of this case against the Defendants, the Plaintiff’s claim is without merit.

(Plaintiff filed an application for withdrawal from a lawsuit, but the withdrawal has no effect due to the lack of consent by the Defendants).

arrow