logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.04.14 2014가단5270925
양수금
Text

1. The Defendants jointly and severally discharged the Plaintiff’s Intervenor from KRW 77,537,364 and KRW 43,876,674 among them to the Plaintiff’s Intervenor.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff's successor's claim

(a) Indication of claims: To describe the cause of claims and the changed cause of claims as shown in attached Form;

(However, the "creditor" is the plaintiff, and the "debtor" is the defendant, and the payment order has become final and conclusive. (B)

Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act)

2. On December 12, 2014, while the Plaintiff’s claim was pending in the instant lawsuit, transferred to the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor the claim of this case against the Defendants, the Plaintiff’s claim is groundless.

(Plaintiff filed an application for withdrawal from a lawsuit, but the withdrawal has no effect due to the lack of consent by the Defendants).

arrow