1. As to the Plaintiff’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s 25,614,232 won and 25,058,251 won among them, the Defendant shall start from January 6, 2015.

1. Since the Plaintiff transferred the claim of this case against the Defendant to the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff during the course of the lawsuit of this case, the Plaintiff’s claim based on the premise that the obligee of the claim of this case is the Plaintiff is without merit without further review.

(Plaintiff submitted an application for withdrawal from a lawsuit on September 23, 2015, but the withdrawal did not take effect without the Defendant’s consent). 2. Determination as to the Plaintiff’s successor’s claim

(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;

(Provided, “Defendant 1” and “Defendant 2” are changed to “Defendant 1” and “Defendant 2” to “A,” and at the end of the cause of the claim, the Plaintiff’s successor was assigned the instant claim against the Defendant during the instant lawsuit.” (B)

Judgment by deemed confession: Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act