beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and by a fine of thirty million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a person who received a fine of KRW 3 million from this court, due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) on October 15, 2008, a fine of KRW 4 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (dacting driving) on March 9, 2012, and a fine of KRW 3 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (dacting driving) on September 30, 2014.
The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of C Spoon vehicles.
1. On July 30, 2015, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol content of 0.110% in blood without a vehicle driver’s license on July 23:5, 2015, and the Defendant driven the said vehicle at approximately 2 km from the street in front of the “the sixth apartment house in the Pyeong-dong after Chuncheon” in the same city from the street to the street in front of the “Gwon University Hospital” in the same city.
2. The Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: (a) was under the influence of drinking in front of the Gangwon-do University Hospital at the time of the day set forth in paragraph (1) and was asked by D to disclose his/her identity; (b) was under the influence of E, and (c) was under the influence of E.
Accordingly, the defendant used another person's resident registration number unlawfully.
3. The Defendant at the time and place indicated in paragraph 2, such as the electronic records, and the electronic records of the above writers, had D, who is aware of the same fact as Paragraph 2, enter the personal information of E and the violation in a personal portable device (PDA) that informs D of the results of the control of driving alcohol after measuring drinking, and thereafter, D requested D to sign in the confirmation column of the driver of the inquiry screen as a result of the control of driving alcohol of the portable device, and sent D, who is aware of the above fact, arbitrarily signed “E” with the pen, and sent it to the traffic police computer network as if the files were genuinely prepared as a result of regulating driving of drinking.
Accordingly, the defendant is a private electronic record on fact certification for the purpose of making a clerical work smooth.