거래처가 자료상으로 판명되었지만 금지금을 실제 매입했다는 주장의 당부[국승]
Seoul High Court 2009Nu8344 ( November 13, 2009)
The legitimacy of the assertion that the customer has actually purchased gold bullion although the customer was proved to be material;
The fact that the customer prepared a false tax invoice that is not a real transaction is finalized in the criminal judgment, and there is no evidence to prove that it has been paid as the purchase price, and it is judged as a non-real transaction.
The contents of the decision shall be the same as attached.
All appeals are dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.
All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds prescribed in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal, or are recognized as groundless. Thus, all of the appeals are dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided